Seriously? A split opinion on a case as the last one? Are they reading the blog and just want to make my day THAT much harder? I’m a stone’s throw away from thinking the supreme court is sending radio waves into my head to tell me to write things in this blog. Better start making that tin foil hat now.
I will save you the reading, and behind the scenes extrapolate the law that sticks:
Never mind. No law was created. The concurrence was in result only. 4 for the majority (majority reasoning), 3 for the concurrence (refusing to adopt the majority’s reasoning), and 2 for the dissent (which also fails to adopt the majority’s reasoning). However, 7 voted for the specific result. Strode’s conviction is upheld.